Contact Us

Phone
0412 085 772

Email
chriscerni@hotmail.com

Address

Online Enquiry

* Required fields

Are cheap materials efficient? Or will you pay more later on?

29/06/2022

With the rise in globalisation and internationalisation, businesses are quickly shifting their focus to the changing dynamics of the labour force in every industry, including house maintenance projects. This is due to the fact that stakeholders across all industries are growing more concerned about labour trends. It is now evident that cheap labour usually means bad work, which may end up costing you a lot more later on.

Prior to the realisation of this fact, organisations used to outsource cheap labour from countries like China in order to reduce costs and improve business operations. This strategy, however, is no longer viable, especially for home maintenance projects.

Increasing production costs have made it necessary for businesses to employ more efficient labour practices in order to maintain their competitiveness. For example, decking businesses now want to improve the aesthetics of a home and want to use the best materials and labour to do the job.

 

Cheap Labour and Materials May Not Be Longer Efficient for Decking Projects

In order to give homeowners the best returns on their investments, companies strive to lower their manufacturing costs. The migration of manufacturing to low-cost economies through outsourcing agreements are some alternatives available to achieve this aim. Maximising an organisation's profitability is the ultimate goal. However, hiring cheap labour to do the job comes with certain drawbacks.

Through outsourcing, production can be moved to low-cost markets in exchange for administrative control over the final product. When a corporation enters into a contract to produce a whole product or a portion of a product, it cedes control of the manufacturing process to third parties who are not employees of the company.

As a result, missions may not be aligned properly and the outcome may not be the same as you had in mind. Foreign-based manufacturers may prioritise maximising profits by providing goods in accordance with the terms or procedures outlined in a contract by engaging in practices like workforce exploitation and child labour that are not supported by the organisation that is situated in a developed country.


An enormous amount of data is handled and stored during production processes. A production vendor in a low-cost economy must have access to this data because it is necessary for the production process. The chance that such data may be stored without confidentiality in this situation could put an organisation's information and systems in danger. Moving production to low-cost markets can occasionally lead to issues with quality.

An organisation cannot demand higher levels of quality with respect to changes in products made by competitors without imposing additional costs if the items that are produced in low-cost markets match the requirements that are set in a production contract.


Even so, the capability and adaptability of the manufacturing processes used by low-income producers are constrained, even when an organisation is eager to adopt this approach. Moving production to low-cost markets poses substantial disadvantages, which may damage an organisation's reputation that was formerly the top choice for many customers through hidden costs and unwanted press where a vendor makes goods using child labour or exploitation.

For more information, please visit our website.